🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."