🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be slashed by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more elected officials depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently spent years generating community backing and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that voted to keep their seats.